New book covers with the identity of female writers who used male names
The Brazilian project OriginalWriters by the company HP and an advertising agency wants
to encourage the reading of novel female writers who used male pseudonyms. The
company decided to make new covers, so that readers can know the real identity
of its female authors. The plan also includes the translation of these works
for publication in Portuguese.
Books by 19th-century and early 20th-century female authors, especially European ones, were already available on the Gutenberg Project website – which offers, free of charge, more than 50,000 works in the public domain. Access the website here.
The project also includes the search for Brazilian women who have done the same and who can have their books available free.
In the previous post we saw why novel writers use male pseudonyms as their book signatures (see here). This happened not only in the 18th and 19th centuries; it also extended throughout the 20th century.
"If
there was any questionable sexual element in the novels, or considered
inappropriate for a society lady, they would be judged. The pseudonym was also
a way of protecting one's personal life."
However,
according to the researcher, the phenomenon has not disappeared completely. At
the beginning of the 20th century, the French-British Violet Paget kept her writings – which ranged from books on travel
and music to supernatural tales, art reviews, essays on liberalism and novels –
under the pseudonym Vernon Lee,
perhaps also to avoid comments about his homosexuality.
In
the 1990s, British female writer J.K.
Rowling withheld her first name, Joanne,
at the suggestion of the company that published her work. In interviews after
the worldwide success of her Harry
Potter book series, she said she was persuaded by her editor to abbreviate
her first names. Her more ambiguous signature would make it easier for the
books to be read by boys.
To
escape the expectations surrounding her first detective novel, Rowling also
chose a male pseudonym, Robert Galbraith.
Nevertheless, she was soon discovered. The book had sold poorly, but received
such positive reviews that it raised suspicions that it was not a debut novel
by a new author. After the revelation, a first signed edition of the work was
sold for more than US$ 2,300.
'Literature for men' vs 'Literature for women'
The
phenomenon of market segmentation between "literature for women" and
"literature for men" is also something recent and contributes to the
fact that female writers who want to exceed the public's expectations for their
books change their names, as in the case of JK Rowling and Harry Potter.
Sandra Vasconcelos, female professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of São Paulo (USP), recalls that men also read fiction novels. Men made much of the comments on novels made in the newspapers. In addition, some of the greatest novels with female protagonists are by male writers. There was no such difference because everyone read everything.
"Now there's a bigger dichotomy in terms of gender and reading practices. Since Jane Austen, for example, became popular, it's only been in the last 20 years that men have stopped reading her and no longer want to take classes about her", she says.
“It
is absurd to consider, in the 21st century, that stories about women,
especially if they have some kind of love story in the plot, are automatically
considered minor literature and women only".
We cannot change history
If
the HP project says it intends to reprint
the history of these writers using their own names, American researcher Sue
Lanser warns that the idea needs to be careful.
"It's
a good idea, but it's also important to keep the names under which they
originally published their works. It's a way of honoring the trajectory of
these women."
“Not
all of them just wanted to protect themselves with the pseudonym. Some were
trying to inhabit other identities. Perhaps Mary Ann Evans or Violet
Paget actually felt like George Eliot
and Vernon Lee when they wrote.”
“Even
if some of them were trying to hide, we also need to show our past, we can't
change it. You can't change history and turn it into something we would like it
to be.”
No comments:
Post a Comment